High-fidelity wireframes often become the product of the conversation instead of a tool for it. People respond to spacing, font choices, and visual weight before they’ve agreed on whether the flow is right. The wireframe becomes the thing being reviewed rather than the logic it was meant to represent. [[Breadboarding over wireframes]] exists as an alternative because it removes the surface that pulls attention away from structure.
[[Fat-marker method]] is the physical version of this constraint: a tool that can’t produce detail forces the work to stay at the level where it’s still useful to question. [[Visual thinkers vs. visualisers]] is the underlying distinction: if the room is full of visualisers, high-fidelity input produces high-fidelity feedback on the wrong things.